Aerodynamics and Relationship to Speed
Posted
#847523
(In Topic #101234)
Guest user
Aerodynamics and Relationship to Speed
Obviously you need to get the Golf through the air with as little amount of drag or wake as possible as 30 - 50% - 80% engine power used just trying to push the Golf through the air.
So weight off, grille blocking, wipers off, panel gaps taped, underside, smooth, tyre wind deflectors.
Parts Percentage of Total Drag
Cooling package (including radiator, intercooler, oil cooler, etc) 33.4%
Exterior 31.7% (this is on a .29 Cd car)
Front wheels 13.1%
Rear wheels 6.9%
Floor 6.9%
Rear Axle 3.1%
Engine 3.1%
Front Suspension 1.4%
Exhaust 0.7%
The links below may be worth a look.
http://autospeed.com/cms/A_2455/article.html
http://autospeed.com/cms/A_2456/article.html
http://autospeed.com/cms/A_2160/article.html
http://autospeed.com/cms/A_2455/article.html
It may be worth thinking about?
Posted
Local Hero
Posted
Guest user
Regarding wheel deflectors these few cars show the subtle improvements car manufactures use to cut through the air. small 2mm thick, 25 -35mm plastic boards to defuse the air before it gets to the tyre, and yet not big enough to create front or rear end lift or wake out the side i.e. drag.
The golf seems to have a metal plate to smooth air over the front arch perhaps? Including the improved mk2 bumper aerodynamics, and angled side sill near the rear wheel deflecting air down from directly hitting the tyre. Wouldn't suprise me if he isn't grill blocking aswell, especially if he only uses it for QM.
Posted
Old Timer
Posted
Guest user
But as we are on a MK1 forum and Mk1's run the QM its a good place to post a topic on shaving tenths off times
Posted
Local Hero
did a 14.5 with no rear seats so lets see what we can take off
bonnet
hood
bumpers
back box
rear seats
passenger seat
parcel shelf
door cards
before you say it bonnet all the mk1 escort guys run without them apparently ill get scene points for that
Posted
Old Timer
You can add wheel spoilers and smooth underfloors and whatever else, but they wont make much difference unless the whole rest of the car is fully optimised.
We're talkin short overhangs, roof curvature, similar bonnet/screen angles, and air flowing easily through the engine compartment. These things would be difficult to change on a mk1, and if you did it would probably look nothing like a mk1. :?
Posted
Local Hero
Lowering - reduces frontal area and the amount of air under the car
Use GTI spoiler - I have done back-back runs with/without, adds 0.2s if not fitted
Remove mirrors
If you're serious about it, put the drivetrain into a Mk1 Scirocco, these are around 4" lower than the Golf even before any lowering, etc.
Posted
Local Hero
Posted
Guest user
bens_cab said
before and after with the spolier paul was that just because one of the pod marshalls had to retreive it from the strip last year
Lol
But i don't think you can do much without changing it from being a Mk1 as you say, but wouldn't the rest help? Even if you left the profile of the car and simply removed the weight and extra bits?Phataz1 said
You can add wheel spoilers and smooth underfloors and whatever else, but they wont make much difference unless the whole rest of the car is fully optimised.
Blocking off the rear valance could be effective without the overall change in anything visible, as its very untidy under the back end. its like a parachute! Your right about the 30 degree angle of the hatch, but on the cab, the rear side windows have a very big step to the roof on the leading edge to the air, piece of trim would sort that out with duct tape
I would still be inclined to make a simply panel out of black 2mm plastic board and cable tie it to the grill to reduce the air flow into it. seems popular in the US for drag running. Even if you take it off straight away after the run…
Posted
Local Hero
Posted
Local Hero
Posted
Guest user
chudd said
I would have thought a cabriolet was more aerodynamic with the hood up ?
Don't they do less MPG with the hood down ? Same as having the windows down .
I think so Chudd
I would have thought it is better to keep the air "attached" to the car(hood up), than detached, turbulent and creating a bigger wake. The air will get real messy once it goes over the windscreen otherwise.
These 2 articles below, with pics discuss attached and detached air in a car (its not indepth language, but idiot or Emm proof )
Content from the article:
Cars with gently sloping rear windows ? often hatchbacks or coupes ? allow the airstream to remain attached right to the rear of the car, so producing only a small wake. The transitional curve between the roof and the hatch needs to be gentle if the airflow is to remain attached, and the angle of the hatch to the horizontal is also critical. It?s important to note that while it may look ?obvious? to the eye that the airflow remains attached across a coupe or hatchback?s rear, wool tuft testing needs to be carried out to prove this.
What happens at the back of the car is extremely important in determining total drag, rear axle lift and, to a more limited extent, front axle lift. In many cases, the flow at the back of the car is more important than the flow behaviour at the front
http://autospeed.com/cms/A_109778/article.html?popularArticle
http://autospeed.com/cms/A_108677/article.html?popularArticle
Posted
Old Timer
Of course these things can make a difference, it's just at what cost…unless it's all C/Fed up.
Doubt its worth it. Plough the money into getting power down tbh.
Mk1 Golf 16V Conversion FAQ Zip, now located at in the Forum WIKI section: http://vwgolfmk1.org.uk/index.php?page=cedi&type=misc&id=42%2F26%2F3
Posted
Old Timer
It basically delays the turbulant air swirling back and causing the vacuum behind the car.
Another major drag factor in many cars is the mirrors as paul c said. Removing these and fitting a windage tray or GTI spoiler are probably the best things you can do. Things such as taping up gaps are not worth doing
Like said, if you have enough power, aerodynamice doesnt matter lol :mrgreen:
Posted
Local Hero
if i did lose the hood and boot lid surely the air will go straight through the car causing less drag
anyway to the above question my car seems quicker with the hood down and the wind deflector up perhaps its just a noise thing i dont know :wink:
Posted
Guest user
Regarding the removal of the bonnet and the boot lid. Yeah its difficult to say whether the weight saving will be outweighed by the shocking air flow over and around the car. Initially you will be quicker with less weight. But i would have thought that as the speed builds and the force needed to push an increased drag and wake car, you may expend more power trying to push the car through the air at the end, than you gain off the line…
Interesting to think about it though. (if you are a little sad like me )
I still think hood up but it would be great to see some back to back runs. however i suppose its so hard to be consistant with so many variables.
Posted
Local Hero
Posted
Guest user
I know its only a discussion and general runs but its good to hear what you all do or think of in the area other than just POWER!
Posted
Local Hero
0 guests and 0 members have just viewed this: None.
Control functions: