performance cam, worth it?
Posted
#747375
(In Topic #89902)
Settled In
performance cam, worth it?
thinkin of doing a couple of mods to the 1.8 gti, was wondering whether getting a new schrick cam would make much difference, or should i just keep it original?
thanks,
simone
Posted
Local Hero
If its a 16V, you're fraught with difficulties - many people have fitted aftermarket cams, and found they add almost nothing to BHP while losing driveability elsewhere.
Posted
Settled In
Posted
Local Hero
rebuild in progress....
Posted
Local Hero
Posted
Settling In
volkswagens dont leak they mark their teritory
Posted
Local Hero
jonezi said
im putting a cam in my engine only problem is im getting rid of the 1.3l driver and putting in a 1.6l scirocco with flat top pistons and a highlift cam which should take me upto 8000rpm im told the cam will give me between 20 and 30 bhp if you need more info i can find out
What do you mean "the pistons and cam should take me up to 8000rpm"?
Posted
Old Timer
paul_c said
If its a 16V, you're fraught with difficulties - many people have fitted aftermarket cams, and found they add almost nothing to BHP while losing driveability elsewhere.
I thought its normally the 'budget' cams (Kent, Pipers etc) that people have problems with, have heard good things about Newmans and Shricks on CGTI. But they're really pricey!
Am thinking of trying some Techtonics ones from the states, with teh exchange rate at the moment they come out at around ?250!
Mk1 Golf 16V Conversion FAQ Zip, now located at in the Forum WIKI section: http://vwgolfmk1.org.uk/index.php?page=cedi&type=misc&id=42%2F26%2F3
Posted
Local Hero
paul_c said
jonezi said
im putting a cam in my engine only problem is im getting rid of the 1.3l driver and putting in a 1.6l scirocco with flat top pistons and a highlift cam which should take me upto 8000rpm im told the cam will give me between 20 and 30 bhp if you need more info i can find out
What do you mean "the pistons and cam should take me up to 8000rpm"?
and flat top ones too?
Posted
Local Hero
rebuild in progress....
Posted
Local Hero
why would think bent valves?
Posted
Local Hero
i thank you for your definition of highlift cam :wink:
rebuild in progress....
Posted
Settling In
volkswagens dont leak they mark their teritory
Posted
Local Hero
jonezi said
i think the 1.3 engine as standard peaks at 6500rpm with the high lift cam it should rev to 8000rpm but it all depends how you want your engine set up either high speed or acceleration depends on what degree cam you need
Why does the cam make it rev higher?
Posted
Local Hero
Posted
Settled In
which cam (and other mods :roll: perhaps) would you suggest if:
the head has been port/polished,
new pistons fitted,
k&n air filter fitted,
and re-bored to 2.0
4 branch exhaust manifold…?
other small mods in mind include new rad, coolant hoses, oil cooler, new bosch fuel injectors, re-balanced flywheel, audi throttle body.
but the main priority at the mo is the cam and pulley set up, recommendations please?
thanks,
simone
Posted
Settled In
…I didn't want to clog the threads so thought it fitting to resurrect an old query which after many moons I am finally at this stage. Do I get some sort of reward for this?…
I have managed to source a new head as the previous owner(s) had actually skimmed up to 1.0mm of the original!! Maybe to assist compression with his P&P job.
The u/s of the head when examined was not even entirely flat, albeit very close.
The block had been bored to about 81.5mm, but I have not been able to assess the gasket fitted. I don't want to chance another 1.8 gasket. Would you recommend a steel gasket from a 2.0 mk3 or other, given the slightly larger bore??
While a new head is being built I am getting a P&P on it. To complete this I am planning a wider TB & looking for a new camshaft.
My preference is for a Kent, Piper, or maybe even a Schrick 276 solid lifter cam. Will be getting a vernier too btw.
The issue is the above cam makers now only have min. 276 degree durations, and I don't want to lose the low-end zip the engine offers. The Cyl.Head builder doesn't advise Newman. Also, I really don't want lumpy idle at all!
I hear Schrick's 276 only comes on song at 3.5kRPM so I don't fancy spending big just for that!
Is there a reason why the Kent & Piper have wider power bands at same/higher cam durations as the Schrick?
Their lobe centres are almost identical 110,110 & 108 (for the Piper). I've had a good rummage on ClubGTi but didn't see any answers
Can you I have your recommendations please??
Ta,
Si
0 guests and 0 members have just viewed this: None.